Hi, I'm Korean. I'm sorry I did not speak English well.

i want connect wifi in kail linux

root@ming:~#uname -r

4.3.0-kali1-amd64

root@ming:~#cat /proc/version

Linux version 4.3.0-kali1-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 5.3.1 20160101 (Debian 5.3.1-5) ) #1 SMP Debian 4.3.3-5kali4 (2016-01-13)

root@ming:~# ifconfig

eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500

        inet 192.168.168.104  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.168.255

        inet6 fe80::4ecc:6aff:fede:37cc  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>

        ether 4c:cc:6a:de:37:cc  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

        RX packets 19530  bytes 18639715 (17.7 MiB)

        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0

        TX packets 14615  bytes 1927816 (1.8 MiB)

        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

        device interrupt 19 

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536

        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0

        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>

        loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)

        RX packets 20  bytes 1200 (1.1 KiB)

        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0

        TX packets 20  bytes 1200 (1.1 KiB)

        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

root@ming:~# ^C

root@ming:~#

not found wireless.. (wlan0)...

i use intel iwlwifi-3168

i try 인텔® 무선 어댑터용 Linux* 지원

download iwlwifi-3168-ucode-22.361476.0.tgz

and copy /lib/firmware

i try compat-wireless-2010-06-26-9.tar.bz2 down

cd compat-wireless-2010-06-26-9.tar.bz2

make unload

load

create wlan0 wlan1 but not fount wifi....

i want wifi !! 

help me !

Intro

We are having trouble with the MSI update package on our systems. The issue is that between 1-3% of our systems are not able to boot after the update is applied. Are there more organizations with this issue and is there a sollution?

Background

- We have machines, HP (elitebook) and Dell (lattitude), laptops all running on Win 7 64b, with Intel Wireless 7260, 7265, 8260 or 8265 chipsets.

- We are updating them with SCCM since version 17.00 and haven't had a problem until version 19.70 and now 20.00 of the msi installer.

Problem

The machines with the problem in some cases get a bluescreen after the installation and all are not booting after "Windows is Starting". We haven't had much luck reproducing the issue on our test machines and we cannot detect a a pattern in chipset/model etc.. It looks like a random 3% of our laptop population. Our total population is 5000 laptops and we have now updated about 1500 to version 20.00. And have put the update on hold until we have more information.

Troubleshooting

All the issues have now been restored by starting in Save Mode and locally repair the MSI, this works almost all cases, but this is not a tactic we're willing to continue .

Possible cause?
The only thing we now have is that all machines with the issue took 12 minutes to complete the installation and 'normal' machine took only 30sec. The difference in time is explained in de msi log by two timeouts that occur in de CA LaunchAppandWait:

Log (8408)(09:02:00:403): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait entering

Log (8408)(09:02:00:403): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait calling CreateProcess for [C:\Program Files\Intel\WiFiDrivers\Drivers\iprodifx.exe] with argv ["C:\Program Files\Intel\WiFiDrivers\Drivers\iprodifx.exe" /Silent]

Log (8408)(09:08:01:103): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait - Wait Timed Out: [102]

Log (8408)(09:08:01:103): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait leaving

MSI (s) (28:74) [09:08:01:113]: Executing op: ActionStart(Name=CA_PSM_DRIVER4_InstallDrivers,,)

Log (8408)(09:08:01:103): CA_Drv - IProDifxDriver4InstallOrRepairDrivers leaving

MSI (s) (28:74) [09:08:01:113]: Executing op: CustomActionSchedule(Action=CA_PSM_DRIVER4_InstallDrivers,ActionType=3073,Source=BinaryData,Target=PsmDriver4InstallOrRepairDrivers,)

MSI (s) (28:D0) [09:08:01:133]: Invoking remote custom action. DLL: C:\WINDOWS\Installer\MSIE36A.tmp, Entrypoint: PsmDriver4InstallOrRepairDrivers

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - PsmDriver4InstallOrRepairDrivers entering

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - GetIntelProductID - Entering

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - GetIntelProductID - [ProductCode]={EC68A5E6-D014-41B9-A741-63B57439ACEC}

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - GetIntelProductID - WiFiDrivers - Exiting

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - LoadInstallDirectory - Looking for InstallDir in [SOFTWARE\Intel\WiFiDrivers]

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - LoadPsmDriverDirectory [C:\Program Files\Intel\PowerSharingManager\Drivers\]

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait entering

Log (8408)(09:08:01:183): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait calling CreateProcess for [C:\Program Files\Intel\PowerSharingManager\Drivers\InstallPsm.exe] with argv ["C:\Program Files\Intel\PowerSharingManager\Drivers\InstallPsm.exe" install]

Log (8408)(09:14:01:377): CA_Drv - LaunchAppandWait - Wait Timed Out: [102]

We don't know for sure why the timeouts occur and if that is indeed the cause of the issues.

Hello,

I've bought a new laptop (with Intel Wireless AC 8265) since last week and I experienced some issue on the internet connection of the laptop. Sometimes when the laptop connected to the internet, the entire network became suddenly slow for a period of time. And when I opened some programs, especially games (Overwatch, GTA V (online)), the entire network is significantly slow and with increasing ping and finally disconnected from the game server. But immediately when I closed the game, everything seems fine again. Moreover, the download speed of the laptop is considerably slower than my phone (also with 802.11ac dual band), but the upload speed are the same or even faster on my laptop. But watching even 4K video on Youtube didn't affect like those aforementioned games, even if it should affect more.

I followed a lot of threads in Intel community and also other communities (e.g. Microsoft) and saw a lot of workarounds but none of them worked for my case. The following are my attempts on this,

- Disabled RSC on the adapter (already undone because I believe that Windows released the patch for that and my laptop is already updated)

- Changed MTU from 1500 to 1400

- Changed in the advanced setting of network

    -- Switch between VHT and HT mode but no difference

    -- Lower roaming aggressiveness

    -- Enabled/Disabled U-APSD support

    -- Uninstalled Intel PROSet driver and installed from Lenovo website (my laptop is Lenovo E470)

I also attached the log from Intel SSU.

Note: my previous 4-year-old laptop was able to run those games very well without internet problem

Best regards

Hi,

I have a HP-15-au114tx laptop with Intel Dual Band AC 3168 wireless adapter in it. The problem is that the maximum speed for wifi is not able to cross 100 mbps (even though the rated limit is 433 mbps). My connection type is 802.11ac and have a 1-giga-bit plan for internet, but even after this the wireless adapter fails to give speed above 100 mbps.

Please look in this matter ASAP and provide a solution for it.

Thank you.

Has anyone had issues with the dual band AC-3165, if so can anyone let me know if it was the adapter. 

We are having many issues related to Wi-Fi. I see lots of error like shown below. The wi-fi disconnects pretty frequently.

WLAN AutoConfig service failed to connect to a wireless network.

Network Adapter: Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260

Interface GUID: {35287cef-e794-408d-af75-bb5658ecc4d3}

Connection Mode: Automatic connection with a profile

Profile Name: <name>

SSID: <name>

BSS Type: Infrastructure

Failure Reason:The driver disconnected while associating.

RSSI: 255

I have tried most of the suggestion posted in google (like updating the driver/changing the power settings etc) But the problem still continues. Pls suggest what else i can try. We have lenovo laptops (around 400-500).

So I have the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 WIFI Card and I started having this issues today where I have to install the ProSet drivers every time I restart the PC to be able to use WIFI and Bluetooth and it is super annoying so if anyone can help me with this here are the SSU logs https://hastebin.com/uduyafayoy.vbs

After updating my Wifi driver to 20.0.2.3 (2-3 weeks ago), I've twice gotten a blue screen crash on resume from sleep. As this driver version is the first to include the KRACK vulnerability fix, it is not reasonable to roll back to an older version. An inspection of the last memory dump reveals the following:

PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA (50)

Invalid system memory was referenced.  This cannot be protected by try-except.

Typically the address is just plain bad or it is pointing at freed memory.

Arguments:

Arg1: ffff8009f4c00000, memory referenced.

Arg2: 0000000000000002, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation.

Arg3: fffff80032d896af, If non-zero, the instruction address which referenced the bad memory

    address.

Arg4: 0000000000000002, (reserved)

Debugging Details:

------------------

DUMP_CLASS: 1

DUMP_QUALIFIER: 401

BUILD_VERSION_STRING:  15063.0.amd64fre.rs2_release.170317-1834

SYSTEM_MANUFACTURER:  LENOVO

SYSTEM_PRODUCT_NAME:  20FQS04X00

SYSTEM_SKU:  LENOVO_MT_20FQ_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th

SYSTEM_VERSION:  ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th

BIOS_VENDOR:  LENOVO

BIOS_VERSION:  N1FET55W (1.29 )

BIOS_DATE:  09/08/2017

BASEBOARD_MANUFACTURER:  LENOVO

BASEBOARD_PRODUCT:  20FQS04X00

BASEBOARD_VERSION:  SDK0J40697 WIN

DUMP_TYPE:  1

BUGCHECK_P1: ffff8009f4c00000

BUGCHECK_P2: 2

BUGCHECK_P3: fffff80032d896af

BUGCHECK_P4: 2

READ_ADDRESS:  ffff8009f4c00000 Nonpaged pool

FAULTING_IP:

nt!memcpy+af

fffff800`32d896af 660f7f41e0      movdqa  xmmword ptr [rcx-20h],xmm0

MM_INTERNAL_CODE:  2

CPU_COUNT: 4

CPU_MHZ: af8

CPU_VENDOR:  GenuineIntel

CPU_FAMILY: 6

CPU_MODEL: 4e

CPU_STEPPING: 3

CPU_MICROCODE: 6,4e,3,0 (F,M,S,R)  SIG: BA'00000000 (cache) BA'00000000 (init)

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  WIN8_DRIVER_FAULT

BUGCHECK_STR:  AV

PROCESS_NAME:  System

CURRENT_IRQL:  0

ANALYSIS_VERSION: 10.0.16299.15 amd64fre

TRAP_FRAME:  ffffcb80e41c3ec0 -- (.trap 0xffffcb80e41c3ec0)

NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.

Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.

rax=0000000000040000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=ffff8009f4c00020

rdx=0000377d57080000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000

rip=fffff80032d896af rsp=ffffcb80e41c4058 rbp=0000000000000000

r8=0000000000000000  r9=0000000000000800 r10=00000000ffffffff

r11=ffff8009f4c00000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000

r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000

iopl=0         nv up ei ng nz na pe nc

nt!memcpy+0xaf:

fffff800`32d896af 660f7f41e0      movdqa  xmmword ptr [rcx-20h],xmm0 ds:ffff8009`f4c00000=????????????????????????????????

Resetting default scope

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from fffff80032db3156 to fffff80032d7d580

STACK_TEXT: 

ffffcb80`e41c3c28 fffff800`32db3156 : 00000000`00000050 ffff8009`f4c00000 00000000`00000002 ffffcb80`e41c3ec0 : nt!KeBugCheckEx

ffffcb80`e41c3c30 fffff800`32c9e6c6 : 00000000`00000002 ffff8009`f4c00000 ffffcb80`e41c3ec0 ffff8009`d7e8d500 : nt!MiSystemFault+0x116c36

ffffcb80`e41c3cd0 fffff800`32d86d72 : ffff8009`00000005 ffff8009`00000001 00000000`00000000 ffffcb80`e41c3f30 : nt!MmAccessFault+0xae6

ffffcb80`e41c3ec0 fffff800`32d896af : fffff800`3309960a 00000000`00040000 00000000`00000000 ffff8009`00000005 : nt!KiPageFault+0x132

ffffcb80`e41c4058 fffff800`3309960a : 00000000`00040000 00000000`00000000 ffff8009`00000005 ffff8009`eb7c7190 : nt!memcpy+0xaf

ffffcb80`e41c4060 fffff800`330993a4 : 00000000`00040000 00000000`00040000 00000000`00f3ef48 ffffcb80`e41c4160 : nt!CcCopyBytesToUserBuffer+0x4a

ffffcb80`e41c40b0 fffff800`32c5588b : ffff8009`f11081f0 00000000`00000000 ffff8009`00040000 00000000`00000001 : nt!CcMapAndCopyFromCache+0x114

ffffcb80`e41c4150 fffff802`b07d4032 : ffffa08d`00000002 00000000`00000001 ffffa08d`00f3ef48 ffffa08d`00000000 : nt!CcCopyReadEx+0x12b

ffffcb80`e41c41e0 fffff802`b07cc5e3 : ffff8009`d7e50180 ffffcb80`e41c4470 ffffa08d`fa82fc00 00000000`000000ff : NTFS!NtfsCachedRead+0x1a6

ffffcb80`e41c4250 fffff802`b07cb93e : ffff8009`ea73bad8 ffff8009`e4b70880 ffffa08d`fa82fc90 00000000`00000001 : NTFS!NtfsCommonRead+0xad3

ffffcb80`e41c4440 fffff802`ae60563d : ffff8009`eb629b00 ffff8009`e4b70880 ffff8009`dc0c3df0 ffff8009`e4b70c68 : NTFS!NtfsFsdRead+0x1ee

ffffcb80`e41c44f0 fffff802`ae6034d6 : ffffcb80`e41c4580 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000000 ffffcb80`e1cc0180 : FLTMGR!FltpLegacyProcessingAfterPreCallbacksCompleted+0x18d

ffffcb80`e41c4560 fffff800`330a672f : ffff8009`eb7c7190 ffff8009`e4b70880 ffff8009`e4b70cb0 00000000`00000001 : FLTMGR!FltpDispatch+0xb6

ffffcb80`e41c45c0 fffff800`330a5499 : ffff8009`00000001 ffff8009`eb7c7104 ffff8009`eb7c71e0 ffffcb80`e41c4870 : nt!IopSynchronousServiceTail+0x1af

ffffcb80`e41c4680 fffff800`32d88413 : 00000000`00000100 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!NtReadFile+0x6a9

ffffcb80`e41c4780 fffff800`32d80760 : fffff802`b5f73ea9 fffff802`b5e27a60 00000000`00000100 fffff802`b5e27ac8 : nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13

ffffcb80`e41c4988 fffff802`b5f73ea9 : fffff802`b5e27a60 00000000`00000100 fffff802`b5e27ac8 fffff802`b5e27a98 : nt!KiServiceLinkage

ffffcb80`e41c4990 fffff802`b5f74188 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00f3ef48 : Netwtw06+0x533ea9

ffffcb80`e41c4a30 fffff800`32c2fe9b : ffff8009`00f3ef48 ffff8009`dcbc12f0 ffff8009`dcbcd060 ffff8009`e2333040 : Netwtw06+0x534188

ffffcb80`e41c4a90 fffff800`32c4f168 : 00000000`00000100 ffff8009`ed89d640 fffff800`32c2fda0 00000000`00000000 : nt!IopProcessWorkItem+0xfb

ffffcb80`e41c4b00 fffff800`32cedeb7 : 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000080 ffff8009`d7e8d500 ffff8009`ed89d640 : nt!ExpWorkerThread+0xd8

ffffcb80`e41c4b90 fffff800`32d82a06 : fffff800`311fa180 ffff8009`ed89d640 fffff800`32cede70 ffffcb80`e41c4d29 : nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x47

ffffcb80`e41c4be0 00000000`00000000 : ffffcb80`e41c5000 ffffcb80`e41be000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiStartSystemThread+0x16

THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD_FUNC:  e8a4222b200fd5e09a45e55f7343347a90e99999

THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD_FUNC_OFFSET:  3008069a119e51096ddb4b95f9511eca7af74429

THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD:  acd05c535281c782b7d45b17bb5c152018f5e1ee

FOLLOWUP_IP:

Netwtw06+533ea9

fffff802`b5f73ea9 33d2            xor     edx,edx

FAULT_INSTR_CODE:  4489d233

SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  11

SYMBOL_NAME:  Netwtw06+533ea9

MODULE_NAME: Netwtw06

IMAGE_NAME:  Netwtw06.sys

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  59d213eb

STACK_COMMAND:  .thread ; .cxr ; kb

BUCKET_ID_FUNC_OFFSET:  533ea9

FAILURE_BUCKET_ID:  AV_INVALID_Netwtw06!unknown_function

BUCKET_ID:  AV_INVALID_Netwtw06!unknown_function

PRIMARY_PROBLEM_CLASS:  AV_INVALID_Netwtw06!unknown_function

OSBUILD:  15063

OSSERVICEPACK:  0

SERVICEPACK_NUMBER: 0

OS_REVISION: 0

SUITE_MASK:  272

PRODUCT_TYPE:  1

OSPLATFORM_TYPE:  x64

OSNAME:  Windows 10

OSEDITION:  Windows 10 WinNt TerminalServer SingleUserTS

OS_LOCALE: 

USER_LCID:  0

OSBUILD_TIMESTAMP:  2017-09-29 09:20:26

BUILDDATESTAMP_STR:  170317-1834

BUILDLAB_STR:  rs2_release

BUILDOSVER_STR:  10.0.15063.0.amd64fre.rs2_release.170317-1834

ANALYSIS_SESSION_ELAPSED_TIME:  c5e

ANALYSIS_SOURCE:  KM

FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING:  km:av_invalid_netwtw06!unknown_function

FAILURE_ID_HASH:  {2101a6f1-56d4-96a1-954f-0b4ab4996965}

I have an intel ac 8265 wireless adapter and latest drivers installed in my lenovo t470p In technical specs miracast support is present. But I can't connect to my miracast TV (which works perfectly with other devices).

When I get the dxdiag's log it says: "Miracast: Not Supported by WiFi driver". I have the latest Intel driver installed (version 20.0.2.3). What drivers should I use to be able to use the miracast?

Hi gents,

just updated my driver to latest one - 18.33.9.3

win 7 x64

the problem:

link is flapping when under load if bluetooth is running

my wifi card is able to drop and establish connection every 30 secs - unusable !

turning bluetooth off is a workaround here, but hey .. Intel ! I am disappointed ...

I will either downgrade or turn BT off or any other ideas to try ?

other devices at home are completely OK ...

Hello,

I've a HP ProDesk 400 G3 Mini (1EX82EA) with a 1 M.2 2280 slot for an optional Wireless NIC.

Can an Intel® Dual Band Wireless-AC be installed in this type of computer? And which of the models will be compatible?

Intel® Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265

Intel® Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265

Or any other type...

Thanks!

PW

In short, my card is not showing up in the drivers list in Windows Device Manager and it does not show up as a hidden device either.  It is encased in an adapter that connects to the motherboard's PCIe x1 slot, along with a wire connecting to the USB hub for Bluetooth. It is correctly seated, but the only thing I see is a indicator light on the adapter saying it is supposedly getting power. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the latest Intel drivers. I'm just wondering if I am missing something or  I need to DOA this chip? It's a brand new chip and I was using a wireless Intel Centrino before, I just really wanted the upgrade! I had that Centrino sitting around until I found this AC 8265. 

System Specs (home build):

Windows 10 64 bit

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-GamingK7

CPU AMD Ryzen 1800x

WiFi Adapter Case: Fenvi FV8802

Let me know if there is more information needed please. 

I have Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165. Windows 10 pro. I've tried every solution so far; resetting, updating, downgrading driver, delete, changing parameters etc. but nothing helps. The thing is when my HP notebook wakes after sleep it takes time to find my wireless network. It takes everything from 10 seconds to a couple of minutes and sometimes not at all. Or it finds it but stays in connection mode. The problem comes and goes and has been a problem for the last 6-8 months. I can reset the network and I got no problem for 2-10 days and then it starts over again with not connecting with no reason so far I can see. I get the warning: 6105 - deauth after EAPOL key exchange sequence.

I've got a single-board computer and when I connect Intel 18260NGW using PCI he identify it as an "unknow device" and accordingly WiFi on my computer doesn't works. I was trying to solve this problem by installing Intel PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software (includes drivers) for Windows 10 but it didn't help.

When booting Linux, the Linux drivers upload firmware build 103 to the Bluetooth part of my Intel AC 8265 wireless adapter. Build 103 seems to be the latest one available to Linux users:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/commit/?id=1dcf7691f623c24762976e2debe05248d627e814

Then, when rebooting the into Windows, the Windows driver doesn't work. In the device manager, the Intel Bluetooth device is marked with a yellow triangle and STATUS_DEVICE_POWER_FAILURE is shown as an error message when checking the properties of the device.

When booting to Windows first, a subsequent reboot to Linux reports that the firmware of the Bluetooth adapter is build 107. My best guess here is that the Windows driver won't accept build 103 and thus refuses to work with it. It seems like the Windows driver does not or cannot upgrade the device firmware to build 107 if build 103 has already been uploaded. Ideally it would simply reset the device and upload whatever firmware it comes with.

Is this a known issue?

How can this issue be resolved?

How is the Windows driver supposed to behave in a dual boot environment?

I have a 32-bit Vista SP2 HP Pavilion dv6835ca laptop with an Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN adapter.  I currently have driver version 12.2.0.11 (released 17-Nov-2008), which is the same driver posted on the HP support page <here> for my computer.

After reading about the recent KRACK / WPA2 vulnerability I thought it would be prudent to update my wireless firmware drivers, but the Intel support page at https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27049/Intel-PROSet-Wireless-Software-and-Drivers-for-Intel-Wireless-WiFi-Link-4965?product=50566 shows that the latest available PROSet/driver versions for XP and Win 7 are v15.3.1/13.4.0.139 while Vista has an older PROSet/driver v14.3.0/13.4.0.139 package.

Is the latest v15.3.1 PROSet wireless software for the WiFi Link 4965 currently posted on that support page for XP and Win 7 also available for Vista?

---------------

32-bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * Firefox ESR v52.5.0 * NS Premium v22.11.2.7 * MB Premium v3.3.1

HP Pavilion dv6835ca, Intel Core2Duo T5550 @ 1.83 GHz, 3 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS, Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN

I know intel is tired of answering the same questions but I do not know I'm in a different situation.

I purchased an Intel Wireless-AC 8265 NGFF Card,

and when I put an Antenna in the MAIN, I get Wireless 2.4ghz / 5.ghz signal.

If I put the AUX antenna, it does not increase the signal at all.

If I take out the MAIN antenna, and leave only the AUX connected, I have no Wifi signal.

How this works? My card are with AUX Connector broken? Its a new card.

I already swap antennas and nothing.

Hello,

I see Intel 8260 wi-fi card's multicast-rx performance to be very bad.

Multicast-Tx seems to be ok because multicast-rx with non-Intel wi-fi card works fine.

Is this is something of a design decision or what ?

I am trying to stream a 128Kb/s, 48KHz, Stereo MP3 using VLC and running Win 10 Creator's Update.

Any info/help would be very helpful & truly appreciated.

Thanks & Regards,

Rajagopal

Hi:

I am having issues with the WiFi performance on a Lenovo X1 (5th Gen).  For a while it has shown bad download speeds.  I am basically comparing it to an HP EliteBook 8440p with the same software (Windows 10), obviously connected to the same network, on Chrome, and via Speedtest.net.  The EliteBook 8440p (6-8 year old computer) blows the new X1 out of the water.  It has double the throughput in download and upload speeds.  The performance is 20 mbps upload and download for X1 vs. 45 mbps for EliteBook.

I was thinking there might be some background process taking up some network capability, but there is none.  And, it would have to be a HUGE network consumption to account for such a difference.  I tried updating the WiFi driver and that seemed to help a little (up to 30 mbps at times), but still lacking.

When using the same network but on a 5 GHz channel, speeds are normal (same to HP laptop).  Also, when the laptop is very close to the router (Apple Extreme), speeds are as expected (equal to HP Laptop).

Any suggestion is very much appreciated.

Thanks,